OWSLA Radio gets crazier every week with Skrillex set on toping each performance. As Skrillex tends to do, the EDM pioneer has taken another public opportunity to command attention with his latest mashup of Drake’s “Hotline Bling”, Rihanna’s “BBHMM” and his own “Summit”.
Skrillex also snagged Jersey club experts DJ Sliink, Uniiqu3, and Nadus to play at a Brooklyn warehouse where they dedicated their sets to showcasing the influential rise of Jersey Club in modern electronic music. Stream the entire episode below and definitely check out Skrillex’s epic Hotline Bling X BBHMM X Summit mashup.
OWSLA Radio on Beats 1 Episode 6 | Stream
<iframe src=”https://vid.me/e/ZfE1?stats=1&tools=1″ width=”640″ height=”480″ frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen scrolling=”no”></iframe>
STAY IN THE KNOW! SIGN UP FOR THE RUN THE TRAP NEWSLETTER
Skrillex
Soundcloud | Twitter | Facebook
▲ ▲ Read More About Skrillex ▲ ▲
—
[By Jordan Farley]
João Mathias Pereira Rezende says
yeah but where the track at
Tucker Everett says
I'll wait for it to come out on the public cloud, no biggie. Anyone who thinks 10 dollar a month streaming is going to go mainstream is out of their mind. Music isn't like video, you listen to it over and over and mindless streaming everything new is just not as enjoyable. It's not like TV where the audience demands a new visual experiecne each time. There isn't enough good music in the world or time in the day to use 10 dolllars every month in song use.
On top of that all this stuff gets put on the radio and youtube. Nobody is going to be compelled for content they get legally or legally enough for free and locking content up behind premium streaming services kills your PR. You cut 80% of your fans out by doing ecxusive releases and they start not liking you as much.
In any case none of the 10 dollar a month streaming services are making any real money, They can't get subsribers at that price. I'd be willing to pay 2-4 dollar a month for streaming music. I already get free cloud service up to 15 gigs from google and it syncs offline automatically with the ability to turn mobile data off.
So.. any android music player, even Google's Play Music can become a wifi syncable offline music player and something like 4-5 gigs of space on your phone equates to about 1000 songs or 2d and 16 hours of music.
I also find their playlists consistently inferior to my own and I don't make playlists a lot or anything, I just spent a few hours making playlists and now I have better playlists that most streaming services that will force crap music on me and then force me to interact with the problem to make it go away. 90% of the time isn't not music I want to hear, a lot of the time I can stand it so I'm not motivated to always remove crap music from their streaming 'radio', and then a good percent of the time it's so horrible and off topic I have to block it from ever playing again.
Why are you people paying for these services? Do you really like hearing crappy new music that much? When did this start? I don't ever remember a time when people liked random crappy music so much. It's like instead of wanting to hear the top songs, like all generations before, this generation wants to stream as many different songs as possible.. and then not remember most of them?
In any case streaming is an expensive addiction and completely uncessary and not all that benefiticial to most. The real benefit in streaming services is really nothing more than the pre-made playlists. If someone would make a good music player for Windows and Android where you could share playlists over LAN and Internet… that's all we ever needed and the entire internet would save terrabytes of bandwidth every second.
Chris Kappas says
https://vid.me/e/ZfE1